Could this please be moved to -chat or something. Current has too much traffic as it is :( Thanks Aniruddha David Rhodus wrote: >On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:11:44 +0100, Doug Rabson <dfr_at_nlsystems.com> wrote: > > >>On Wednesday 18 August 2004 15:28, David Rhodus wrote: >> >> >>>On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:57:19 +0400, Roman Kurakin <rik_at_cronyx.ru> >>> >>> >>wrote: >> >> >>>>I fully agree with you. But this not affect "open source"ness. >>>>I'd rather call it open development. >>>> >>>>rik >>>> >>>> >>>Yes, it does when the public doesn't have direct access to the >>>development work going on. Thats what started this thread in the >>>first place. >>> >>> >>This is ludicrous. You don't have access to my private source trees on >>my private machines where I test and develop software before committing >>it to CVS. How does that change the fact that when I commit that >>software it has a standard two clause BSD open source license. >> >> > >Well that is fine if that is the method in which you are using the >perforce system. But when overly large commits hit the cvs tree from >perforce which should have came with incremental changes so there >could be more detail public scrutiny, etc.. there is a problem. > > >Received on Wed Aug 18 2004 - 13:24:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:06 UTC