Warning! current_at_ is doubled in cc, please remove one. Richard Coleman wrote: > Robert Watson wrote: > >> Last I looked, my primary concerns with Subversion were: >> >> - Cost to import full FreeBSD history. >> >> - That it promised the multi-way branching and merging in a future >> release, but did not yet have it. >> >> Do you know how things look with respect to the second issue? >> >> Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects >> robert_at_fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee >> Research > > > Reading the ChangeLog for the upcoming subversion-1.1 release, it > doesn't look like it. > > http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/CHANGES > > My understanding is that the merge functionality in subversion is > still about the same that is currently in CVS (although faster). > > But there's no denying that subversion is getting better by the day. > For a new project, I wouldn't hesitate to suggest subversion. But for > a large, existing project like *BSD there doesn't seem to be a > compelling reason to switch (yet). But that will change eventually. > > Richard Coleman > rcoleman_at_criticalmagic.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > >Received on Wed Aug 18 2004 - 14:38:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:06 UTC