Re: why 6.0-current?

From: Ceri Davies <ceri_at_submonkey.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:38:54 +0100
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 10:57:10PM +0400, Toxa wrote:
> Recent buildkernel brigns me new os version:
> 
> FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Aug 19 22:28:50 MSD 2004
> 
> I'm wondering, why HEAD tag is not 5.3-CURRENT? According to
> development model, when 5.3-RELEASE will appear, HEAD should becomes 5.4-CURRENT, after 5.4-RELEASE it should bbecomes 5.5-CURRENT, etc...  
> Why 6.0? New development model? Would u mind to drop a link
> describing this.

With 5.3-RELEASE, RELENG_5 becomes -STABLE, and therefore 5.4-CURRENT
will never exist; it will be 5.4-STABLE.  HEAD is now 6.0-CURRENT.  This
has been the plan for quite some time.

Ceri
-- 
It is not tinfoil, it is my new skin.  I am a robot.

Received on Fri Aug 20 2004 - 10:38:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:07 UTC