Re: why 6.0-current?

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 02:46:52 +0200
Toxa <postfix_at_senmail.ru> writes:
> Actually I do read :). But this moment was missed by me as far as
> you can see. RELENG_4 is 4-stable, RELENG_5 is 5-stable, but I
> stupidly thought that HEAD is one step forward from
> RELENG_5_X_RELEASE (e.g., if we have 5.4-release then current is
> 5.5-current, preparing for 5.5-release, becoming 5.6-current after
> 5.5-release is out, etc) 

You are extrapolating from too little data.  This article may help you
understand better:

    http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/releng/

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no
Received on Sat Aug 21 2004 - 22:46:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:07 UTC