On Monday 23 August 2004 14:04, Christian Brueffer wrote: > Hi, > > got this LOR and panic with a 5.3-BETA1 kernel from yesterday on a SMP > machine. Can't say how much time there was between them. A dump is > available. Good. Keep it in a warm and save place, I'll find you on IRC (I hope). > lock order reversal > 1st 0xc0739f20 pf task mtx (pf task mtx) _at_ > /usr/home/build/src/sys/contrib/pf/net/pf.c:5828 > 2nd 0xc103a4c4 user map (user map) _at_ > /usr/home/build/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:2997 > KDB: stack backtrace: > kdb_backtrace(0,ffffffff,c074a9d8,c074bb08,c071a56c) at > kdb_backtrace+0x29 > witness_checkorder(c103a4c4,9,c06f826b,bb5) at witness_checkorder+0x540 > _sx_xlock(c103a4c4,c06f826b,bb5) at _sx_xlock+0x50 > _vm_map_lock_read(c103a480,c06f826b,bb5,2000000,c) at > _vm_map_lock_read+0x3b > vm_map_lookup(d41f7a8c,d21f7000,2,d41f7a90,d41f7a80) at > vm_map_lookup+0x26 > vm_fault(c103a000,d21f7000,2,0,c1969160) at vm_fault+0x6a > trap_pfault(d41f7b54,0,d21f7bac) at trap_pfault+0x11c > trap(18,10,10,c3e24850,c1aa3c00) at trap+0x321 > calltrap() at calltrap+0x5 > --- trap 0xc, eip = 0xc0459c46, esp = 0xd41f7b94, ebp = 0xd41f7c58 --- The LOR is a result of the trap so we can forget about it for the moment. > pf_test(1,c1a38800,d41f7c8c,c1f42820,c0771fe0) at pf_test+0x3c6 > pf_check_in(0,d41f7c8c,c1a38800,1,c3e24800) at pf_check_in+0x32 > pfil_run_hooks(c0771fe0,d41f7cd4,c1a38800,1) at pfil_run_hooks+0xac > ip_input(c3e24800) at ip_input+0x25f > netisr_processqueue(c076fcb8) at netisr_processqueue+0x6e > swi_net(0) at swi_net+0x89 > ithread_loop(c1962b80,d41f7d48,c1962b80,c0500660,0) at > ithread_loop+0x126 > fork_exit(c0500660,c1962b80,d41f7d48) at fork_exit+0xa8 > fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8 > --- trap 0x1, eip = 0, esp = 0xd41f7d7c, ebp = 0 --- > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 1; apic id = 01 > fault virtual address = 0xd21f7bac > fault code = supervisor write, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0459c46 > stack pointer = 0x10:0xd41f7b94 > frame pointer = 0x10:0xd41f7c58 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 38 (swi1: net) > [thread 100012] > Stopped at pf_test+0x3c6: movl %edx,-0xac(%ebp) > db> tr > pf_test(1,c1a38800,d41f7c8c,c1f42820,c0771fe0) at pf_test+0x3c6 hmmm ... pf_test+0x3c6 is something *very* different on my objects right now. Can you sent me your pf.o (possibly with debugging symbols). > pf_check_in(0,d41f7c8c,c1a38800,1,c3e24800) at pf_check_in+0x32 > pfil_run_hooks(c0771fe0,d41f7cd4,c1a38800,1) at pfil_run_hooks+0xac > ip_input(c3e24800) at ip_input+0x25f > netisr_processqueue(c076fcb8) at netisr_processqueue+0x6e > swi_net(0) at swi_net+0x89 > ithread_loop(c1962b80,d41f7d48,c1962b80,c0500660,0) at > ithread_loop+0x126 > fork_exit(c0500660,c1962b80,d41f7d48) at fork_exit+0xa8 > fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8 > --- trap 0x1, eip = 0, esp = 0xd41f7d7c, ebp = 0 --- Thanks in advance. -- /"\ Best regards, | mlaier_at_freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier_at_EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:07 UTC