On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 11:43:19PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote.. > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 09:38:29PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 09:07:20PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote.. > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 11:31:54AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote.. > > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:28:12AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 05:00:27PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > > > > It may never have worked. I've had nothing but panics and problems on > > > > > > my Miata whenever I wanted to use the TGA2 adapter. > > > > > > > > > > I don't think we ever got testing on anything other than TGA1. > > > > > > > > Does it make sense to remove syscons from GENERIC? I mean, it's annoying > > > > > > No, that would be overly radical. > > > > > > If TGA causes problems we should de-orbit TGA from the installkernel. > > > > > > I think that a normal VGA card should not cause any problems. > > > > > > Actually, I am gonna try this now... stay tuned (my systems normally > > > run from serial consoles, and that is how I tested the ISOs before > > > uploading). > > > > OK, like I assumed: a plain VGA console on a 164sx works like a charm with > > BETA1. > > > > I mean, if something like this can boot it.. ;-) [see attached picture] > > > And the picture was? Nuked by the mailinglist somehow? -- Wilko Bulte wilko_at_FreeBSD.orgReceived on Wed Aug 25 2004 - 19:27:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:08 UTC