On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 04:59:19PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > +> > > +> I believe it's -O2 (which is not in default CFLAGS). > > Nope, it was tested with -O2. I made such breakage before, I think, and > it was only exposed on non-i386 archs, AFAIR. Why? Where is the difference? In the compiler. Different code transformations at different times and to different extend can create different warnings. The uninitialized variable is probably the most affected warning due to this. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel_at_xcllnt.netReceived on Sun Aug 29 2004 - 13:40:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:09 UTC