Re: project evil: signal quality

From: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor_at_gsoft.com.au>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:56:21 +0930
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:55, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> > Why do you say that?
> > I am talking about the Windows driver - perhaps it doesn't report signal
> > quality in a standard way.
>
> I assumed, and now that seems wrong, that there is only one
> way the signal quality was retrieved. (the -l option uses an ioctl, whereas
> the option I used uses a socket.

Ahh OK.

I would assume they get the info from the same palce but you never know :)

- -- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBMxzy5ZPcIHs/zowRAuLtAJ9ZV02dj1VvKsfna+86fm5PD7+u1ACdGxZ8
bmHZUgJnkERuw8w0JjxNs7o=
=sZYd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Mon Aug 30 2004 - 10:26:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:09 UTC