In message: <012301c48e25$14924180$84cba8c0_at_hh.kew.com> "Andrew H. Derbyshire" <ahd_at_kew.com> writes: : Basically, any PCI SIO device hogs its interrupt if the PUC device is not : also in the kernel, and this causes real problems for any environment like : mine where pulling the modem is not trivial. Does the distributed GENERIC : kernel have room for the PUC device? Are there side effects that PUC should : be excluded from GENERIC? puc should be in GENERIC, imho. : As a bonus, there appears to be a bug with kernel locking exposed by the : problem. With the stock generic kernel, the XL device reports it couldn't : map the interrupt, and then a lock order reversal is reported. (See the : attached log for the gory details). This is a known problem. WarnerReceived on Mon Aug 30 2004 - 16:44:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:09 UTC