Re: SMP VFS Part 2

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Peter Holm wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 04:11:50PM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Peter Holm wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 05:54:49AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > > > I have updated the patch at:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/smpffs.diff
> > > >
> > >
> > > I got a page fault in kern/vfs_vnops.c:542 due to vp->v_mount == NULL.
> > >
> > > More info at http://www.holm.cc/stress/log/jeff03.html
> >
> > The v_mount should only be NULL very briefly for the rootdevvp.  What is
> > your setup here?  Any filesystems other than devfs and ffs?
> $ mount
> /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local)
> devfs on /dev (devfs, local)
> /dev/ad0s1e on /tmp (ufs, NFS exported, local, soft-updates)
> /dev/ad0s1f on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates)
> /dev/ad0s1d on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates)
> procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
> linprocfs on /usr/compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local)
>
> >I think that
> > deadfs might not set a mountpoint either..  DId you do a forced unmount?
> No.
> > I think I know how I'm going to have to fix this.
> >
>
> Got a new one for you:
> 1) panic: wrong b_bufobj 0 should be 0xc2679c10
> 2) panic: unexpected clean buffer 0xc6624bc8
>
> http://www.holm.cc/stress/log/jeff04.html

I fixed your last panic.   The new patch is up at the same URL.  I'll look
at these now, thanks.  This tool is really working out well.

>
> - Peter
>
> > >
> > > - Peter
> > >
> > > > It includes bug fixes for a handful of problems that were reported, and a
> > > > few more that I found myself.  It also unwinds giant from open(), which is
> > > > a very high risk area, but after a few days of working out bugs it seems
> > > > to be functioning quite well for me.
> > > >
> > > > I did a make -j3 buildworld on a box with a lowered maxvnodes.  I also let
> > > > 'stress' run for 8 loops or so until I ran into an unrelated KSE bug.  I
> > > > did some mount/unmount/single user tests as well.
> > > >
> > > > Use at your own risk.  I still haven't locked quotas, so if you're using
> > > > quota, don't run with this patch.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jeff
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
> > >
> > > --
> > > Peter Holm
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
> > >
>
> --
> Peter Holm
>