On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 02:20:46AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Peter Holm wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:52:19PM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Peter Holm wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Got a new one for you: > > > > > 1) panic: wrong b_bufobj 0 should be 0xc2679c10 > > > > > 2) panic: unexpected clean buffer 0xc6624bc8 > > > > > > > > > > http://www.holm.cc/stress/log/jeff04.html > > > > > > > > I fixed your last panic. The new patch is up at the same URL. I'll look > > > > at these now, thanks. This tool is really working out well. > > > > > > Also fixed the unexpected clean buffer. That was mostly just a bad > > > assert. I'm still baffled by wrong bufobj. > > > > > > > OK. I just do not seem to be able to get past the double panic problem: > > > > $ grep -A 3 ppanic /tmp/tip11.log > > ppanic: unexpected clean buffer 0xc6624bc8 > > cpuid = 0 > > KDB: enter: panic > > [thread pid 54 tid 100042 ] > > -- > > ppanic: unexpected clean buffer 0xc6667ec0 > > cpuid = 0 > > KDB: enter: panic > > [thread pid 54 tid 100042 ] > > -- > > ppanic: unexpected clean buffer 0xc66564e0 > > cpuid = 0 > > KDB: enter: panic > > [thread pid 54 tid 100042 ] > > > > so I've just updated with your last patch. > > Are you just running your stress program? Anything special about your > setup? I see that these are valid bugs, but I'm not able to trigger them > myself. > > > > > - Peter After 05:46:18 of stress testing I get a "wrong b_bufobj 0 should be 0xc2e99484" panic. There's not much to go on, as the panic doesn't enter the debugger. Details at http://www.holm.cc/stress/log/jeff05.html -- Peter HolmReceived on Thu Dec 02 2004 - 13:54:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:23 UTC