On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 04:37:59PM -0700, Scott Long wrote.. > Jason C. Wells wrote: > >--On Wednesday, December 01, 2004 3:02 PM -0700 Scott Long > ><scottl_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > > >>5. Clustered FS support. SANs are all the rage these days, and > >>clustered filesystems that allow data to be distributed across many > >>storage enpoints and accessed concurrently through the SAN are very > >>powerful. RedHat recently bought Sistina and re-opened the GFS source > >>code, so exploring this would be very interesting. > > > > > >This sounds very close to OpenAFS. I don't know what distinguishes a > >SAN from other types of NAS. OpenAFS does everything you mentioned in > >the above paragraph. OpenAFS _almost_ works on FreeBSD right now. > > > >Later, > >Jason C. Wells > > Well, AFS requires an intelligent node in front of each disk. True SAN > clustering means that you have a web of disks directly connected to the > SAN (iSCSI, FibreChannel, etc), and two or more servers on the SAN that > see those disks as a single filesystem (actually a bit more complicated > than this, but you get the point). If one server goes down, no access > to data is lost since the disks can be reached from any other server on > the SAN that is participating in the clustered FS. Find a friendly TruCluster somewhere and take a look. Really Neat(tm). Alternatively find a friendly OpenVMS cluster, they have forgotten more about clusters now than Unix will ever learn (I am afraid). While we are talking storage: multipathing support for SANs is a very neat thing to have. Devices uniquely identified by WWN etc. -- Wilko Bulte wilko_at_FreeBSD.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:23 UTC