Scott Long, Wed Dec 1 14:02:28 PST 2004 > 5. Clustered FS support. SANs are all the rage these days, and > clustered filesystems that allow data to be distributed across many > storage enpoints and accessed concurrently through the SAN are very > powerful. RedHat recently bought Sistina and re-opened the GFS source > code, so exploring this would be very interesting. As we see there are some unfinished pieces (BTW: The freebsd-cluster list is very quiet). I browsed through some of them. It is difficult to judge how far they away from beeing mature. There is: 1) 2x AFS (BSD project, OpenAFS) 2) iSCSI The Lucent code Peter Blok seems to have some ideas comparable to mine when I started to play with iSCSI_at_FreeBSD when I was unemployed last year. (Unfortunatelly not long enough;-) My naive idea for network mirroring to get basic SAN multipath functionality is to combine vinum + iSCSI. Is it achievable? 3) NFSv4 NFS Version 4 is part of FreeBSD now. There is an idea to implement replication but AFAIK it is not implemented yet (I have to check). At least there is a whitepaper: http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/reports/replication.pdf It could be used as a frontend for concurrent access (NFSv4 provides _real_ locking including byterange locking etc.) There are some ideas to implement concurrent access in UFS.. Is it the right place? (Hint: There are many Linux filesystems with beautiful features but it is hard to find a reliable one - possibly because the featuritis makes them too complex?) Maybe it is better to have one specialised filesystem (see Veritas as already mentioned). Or a layer above the "real" FS. BTW: AFAIK ReiserFS (suggested as a FreeBSD port) does not support ACLs.. Regards PeterReceived on Thu Dec 09 2004 - 04:44:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:24 UTC