Hi Max, On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 04:11:26AM +0100, Max Laier wrote: > On Thursday 09 December 2004 03:31, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > panic: mtx_lock() of spin mutex (null) _at_ sys/netinet/frag6.c:682 > > > cpuid = 0 > > > kdb_backtrace+0x37 > > > panic+0x1d1 > > > _mtx_lock_flags+0x72 > > > frag6_slowtimo+0x26 > > > pfslowtimo+0x5a > > > softclock+0x1c0 > > > ithread_loop+0x179 > > > fork_exit+0xe9 > > > fork_trampoline+0xe > > > > > > This is FreeBSD/amd64 from today's sources of about 30 minutes ago. > > > > > >From the instant interpretation unit: it looks like this is another > > > > example of a protocl's timeout firing before the protocol is properly > > initialized, as the mutex appears to be zero'd due to being in BSS. > > Here is a lazy fix: > http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/uipc_domain.c.lazy.diff > > Should help for (almost) sure. This fixes all domains that are initialized in > SI_SUB_PROTO_DOMAIN, those that are initialized later on (netgraph e.g.) can > still trigger this prime example why it's bad to hook something in before > initializing it properly. Unfortunately our code and API force us to do so at > the moment :-\ > > Please tell me if the patch (apply to src/sys/kern/uipc_domain.c) helps. > I've got the same panic early on boot, but in ip_input(), on i386. Your patch helps. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov ru_at_FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:24 UTC