At Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:13:36 -0500 (EST), Jeff Roberson wrote: > If you really have to have the flexibility to do some other method of > concurrency, I suggest we make a table of operations for a process to call > to schedule a thread. That would mean calling setrunqueue(), > choosethread(), adjustrunqueue(), and maybe_preempt() through indirect > pointers. This would mean we could use much simpler versions of these > functions for single threaded programs as well, which would likely reduce > cpu overhead. > As a quick aside, I'd love to see something like this. It could make doing a real time FreeBSD much easier. Later, GeorgeReceived on Tue Dec 14 2004 - 01:10:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:24 UTC