On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 06:19:44PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > >I think removing the #error and putting a note on boot (and in UPDATING) > >that it may still be unstable is a good idea. However, Scott Long has > >expressed reservations > >(http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-December/044341.html) > >and his opinion counts orders of magnitude more than mine. > > > >Jon > > > > I'm definitely not against these fixes going into RELENG_5, but I would > like to see some significant testing be applied to them in HEAD first, > especially to changes that are not confined to just sched_ule.c (and > sched_4bsd.c). > > Scott Glad to hear it. So far hacking the ULE scheduler code from -CURRENT into the RELENG_5 sources myself seems to be working, but I would very much appreciate seeing these changes merged into RELENG_5 as soon as they can be adequately tested. Tony ArcieriReceived on Wed Dec 15 2004 - 00:36:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:24 UTC