Re: Networked single-user recovery (Was: Re: Background fsck is broken)

From: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy_at_siliconlandmark.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:55:03 -0500 (EST)
(Replying to myself)

On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:

> Dropbear appears to be put together from many pieces, all of which seem to 
> carry a BSD-compatible license (IANAL etc etc). It is currently in ports 
> (security/dropbear) and the built, stripped binary appear to "only" be 53K 
> smaller than the OpenSSH one. Because an sshd is a network daemon, security 
> is of course a concern -- Is the 53K of saved space in /rescue (But 
> additional space somewhere else for the convert and key utilities) worth the 
> hassles of tracking upstream distributions of two seperate sshds? I 
> personally tend to think not, but I'm open for comments on this one.

Well, let me correct the size statement before someone else does. It would 
help if I actually compared the size of static versions of these files!

It's late...
Andy

| Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant >
| Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/    >
Received on Thu Dec 16 2004 - 04:55:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:24 UTC