Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 08:38:36AM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > >>Ok, fair enough. I think that the NO_* change warrants an UPDATING >>entry that describes the problem. I know that I'm not the only >>person who was bitten by this. >> > > Checked in as src/UPDATING,v 1.385. > > > Cheers, Ah, apparently I missed that update. Sorry =-) ScottReceived on Thu Dec 23 2004 - 15:06:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:25 UTC