Re: ATA regression

Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 05:22:52PM +0100, S?ren Schmidt wrote:
> 
>>OK, saw this thread a little late, but I committed some updates to this 
>>area earlier today, let me know if that changes anything...
>>
> Unfortunately not.  With
> 
> $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c,v 1.97 2004/12/24 13:36:04 sos Exp $
> $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/ata-lowlevel.c,v 1.51 2004/12/24 13:38:25 sos Exp $
> 
> I still get,
> 
> atapci0: <nVidia nForce3 UDMA133 controller> port 0xffa0-0xffaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 8.0 on pci0
> ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
> ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
> atapci1: <Promise PDC20378 SATA150 controller> port 0xd000-0xd07f,0xd400-0xd40f,0xd800-0xd83f mem 0xfc960000-0xfc97ffff,0xfc99f000-0xfc99ffff irq 5 at device 8.0 on pci1
> atapci1: failed: rid 0x20 is memory, requested 4
> ata2: channel #0 on atapci1
> ata3: channel #1 on atapci1
> ata4: channel #2 on atapci1
> ad0: 76319MB <ST380011A/3.04> [155061/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
> ata1-slave: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device
> acd0: CDRW <COM4824/VER 1.01> at ata1-slave UDMA33
> ata4-master: FAILURE - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out
> ata4-master: FAILURE - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out
> ata4-master: FAILURE - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out
> 
> followed by the instant panic.

The panic message and traceback would be helpfull, as I have a semilar 
setup here that works "just fine" (tm)...
-- 

-Søren