Hi, The test code below will result witness's warning of "lock order reversal": /* lock A then B */ mtx_lock(&A_mtx); mtx_lock(&B_mtx); mtx_unlock(&B_mtx); mtx_unlock(&A_mtx); /* lock B then C */ mtx_lock(&B_mtx); mtx_lock(&C_mtx); mtx_unlock(&C_mtx); mtx_unlock(&B_mtx); /* lock C then A, witness will complaint! */ mtx_lock(&C_mtx); mtx_lock(&A_mtx); mtx_unlock(&A_mtx); mtx_unlock(&C_mtx); But the code seems healthy and will not cause dead locking. So I guess that the lock order relationship should not be transferrable. Or am I missing something? song _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? 完全免费的雅虎电邮,马上注册获赠额外60兆网络存储空间 http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/?http://cn.mail.yahoo.comReceived on Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:30:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:41 UTC