On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 07:28:27AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > This looks relatively good to me. It is a little cleaner than that > patches that we have in our tree, which are slightly less efficient. > We've not noticed any slowdown by using them. I think this is > critical for 5.3 and we should put it in now. Oh, and we've been using our patch for 2 years now w/o bad things happening. We have a build system that tends to expand the paths beyond the limit. Part of that is that we build a chroot enviornment that we then use to build our product so we can update the host enviornment w/o worrying about breaking the target (of course, minor speed-bumps along the way happen, but that's life). It has worked out really well. WarnerReceived on Thu Feb 05 2004 - 05:35:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:41 UTC