Re: Review/Test: Pseudo-device unit number management patch

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 11:35:54 +0100
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0402080034540.24800-100000_at_InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju
lian Elischer writes:
>
>
>On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0402072348240.24800-100000_at_InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju
>> lian Elischer writes:
>> 
>> >> I would appreciate if people would test these devices work _as
>> >> previously_ with this patch in place.
>> >
>> >well that depends on your definition of "as previously"
>> >
>> >Previously, nmdm started off with 4 devices visible in /dev now I don't
>> >see that.. The old behaviour was intuitive... You saw a device.
>> 
>> This new behaviour is called a "cloning device" and it doesn't allocate
>> any resources until they are actually needed, which I belive is the
>> correct behaviour for pseudo-devices.
> 
>As I said.. I doesn't behave _as Previously_  which is what you asked..

I was thinking more of the functional aspect, that characters get from
one side to the other etc.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sun Feb 08 2004 - 01:35:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:42 UTC