On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <p06020404bc4c5fcbfe49_at_[128.113.24.47]>, Garance A Drosihn writes: > >At 9:11 AM +0100 2/8/04, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >>Julian Elischer writes: > >> > > >> > Previously, nmdm started off with 4 devices visible in /dev now > >> > I don't see that.. The old behaviour was intuitive... You saw > >> > a device. > >> > >>This new behaviour is called a "cloning device" and it doesn't > >>allocate any resources until they are actually needed, which I > >>believe is the correct behaviour for pseudo-devices. > > > >Could there be some kind of fake "marker-device" sitting there, > >one which would use basically no resources, and which would > >change to the real-device when someone opens it? > > No, that is not possible with the model we have chosen. s/we/I/ > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. >Received on Sun Feb 08 2004 - 20:13:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:42 UTC