Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked

Hello everyone:

	I'm still using a Pre-November 15, 2003 -CURRENT and had a
question before I upgrade.  With this change, is /bin and /sbin still
separate directories on new installs or are they linked directories?  Do I
have to delete the /bin, /sbin contents prior to the buildworld or will it
just update itself?  Thanks.


Cheers,
Vince - vince_at_WURLDLINK.NET - Vice President             ________   __ ____
Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / |  / |[__  ]
WurldLink Corporation                                  / / / /  | /  | __] ]
San Francisco - Honolulu - Hong Kong                  / / / / / |/ / | __] ]
HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____]
Almighty1_at_IRC - oahu.DAL.NET Hawaii's DALnet IRC Network Server Admin



On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Gordon Tetlow wrote:

> I just committed a patch to change /bin and /sbin from statically to
> dynamically linked. If you don't like the idea of using a dynamically
> linked /bin and /sbin, now is the time to define NO_DYNAMICROOT in your
> make.conf.
>
> The reasons for doing so have been hashed over lots of times. But the
> short of it:
>
> 1) Much smaller /bin and /sbin. On i386, /bin and /sbin are 33 MB static.
>    Dynamically linked, they are only 4 MB.
> 2) Proper support for NSS. This will finally allow you to use NSS modules
>    and get things like usernames in ls -l working for modules that are
>    dynamically loaded.
>
> -gordon