In message <20040219211350.H1230_at_gamplex.bde.org>, Bruce Evans writes: >On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >[The problem turned out to be mainly controlling both undefined behaviour >and standard behaviour with the same flag.] > >> Think if the 'A' option as userland SIGSEGV. (peter_at_ actually suggested >> that I make it kill(getpid(), SIGSEGV) before calling abort in order >> to let a process install a handler for it. > >Programs can already catch SIGABRT, and they probably need to be familiar >with malloc's internals to trap its errors sort of safely, so it is >reasonable to expect them to know what to trap. There is already a hook for catching the message. And I still think you guys overlook the fact that phkmalloc is being a heck of a lot more informative than any other production malloc(3) implementation which generally just croak or corrupt. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Thu Feb 19 2004 - 01:41:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:43 UTC