On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:44:03AM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Feb 22), Joe Marcus Clarke said: > > On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 00:54, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > > > > > WHY in the world is there even a /usr/local/etc/rc.subr ??? > > > /etc/rc.subr on 5-CURRENT is perfectly fine. > > > > It was needed for a short time to workaround a package problem on > > bento. As of the last round of bsd.*.mk changes, this is no longer the > > case. /etc/rc.subr is used where it exists. > > Also needed for 4.x systems. Please read "on 5-CURRENT". It was a pruely 5-CURRENT statement.Received on Sun Feb 22 2004 - 08:09:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:44 UTC