On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:02:11AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Richard Coleman wrote: > > I think it would be more honest if the party line was "FreeBSD > >has bugs, so we can't use -O2 right now" rather than the standard reply > >of "-O2 is not supported, don't even try". > > I think the party line is very honest: > > "You are not the one millionth person to report this, > so you don't get a prize. However, you could be the > first person to fix it. ;-)" I would love to make -O2 work. But as long as "lib/libpam" is on the list of things to fix, that isn't going to happen. Someone needs to pressure DES to fix his babies [that he wont let others touch]. -- -- David (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org)Received on Sun Feb 22 2004 - 10:03:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:44 UTC