>> what i don't understand is why gal/moz has its own resolver. >> for those of us who roam, it seems to mean having to restart >> the browser and lose all our windows/tabs, a major pita. >> >> [ and due to sick natted sites which block 53, one can >> not just have one's laptop's resolv.conf have 127.0.0.1 >> up front and run named ] > > Set your local nameserver to forward only, and make > dhclient generate a file with a forwarders entry that you > can pre-process into a named.conf. and stand on your left foot while holding your nose. why is there a need to replicate dns caching, especially if it casuses folk to think of kinky cruft such as you suggest? where is the win? randyReceived on Sun Feb 22 2004 - 22:37:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:44 UTC