Re: What to do about nologin(8)?

On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:45:07PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote:
>   For security reasons, nologin(8) must be statically linked;

What that mystical reasons are, exactly? I see no one while it is not have
s-bit set. At least -current /sbin is dynamically linked, so nologin must
too.

-- 
Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/