Re: Stray irq7.

From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu_at_apropo.ro>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:59:17 +0200
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:50:19 +1100 (EST)
Bruce Evans <bde_at_zeta.org.au> wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Julien Gabel wrote:
> 
> > >> Getting this message at boot, with yesterday's CURRENT, after disk
> > >> detection.
> > >> stray irq7
> > >> ...
> > >> too many stray irq 7's: not logging anymore
> >
> > > This is most likely either a symptom of the brokenness of the
> > > x86's ISA controller or you've disabled the parallel port driver.
> > > If all the hardware you care about works, you can ignore this
> > > message.
> 
> Er, you mean the correctness of the x86's ISA controller (it reports
> problems if it detects them).  But this is out of date.  Stray irqs
> are now all due to software bugs; glitches in hardware interrupts are
> now mishandled as follows:
[..]

Speaking of stray, where does the following come from and what does it mean ?
(-CURRENT from after kse, APIC, ...)

 # vmstat -i | grep 13
irq13: npx0                            1          0
stray irq13                            1          0

Tnx,

-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user
Received on Tue Feb 24 2004 - 21:57:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:44 UTC