On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Doug White wrote: > > what reports do you expect with the > > > > "Expensive timeout(9) function" > > > > message ? Why do we see it ? > > You compiled your kernel with 'options DIAGNOSTIC'. Unless you have an > explicit reason for doing so, you should not use this option. I do have. Some people added the code for a special purpose I guess - most likely to identify something ? So the question is what's the purpose and if people who compile with DIAGNOSTIC and see it should they report it and if so what should they report ? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/Received on Sun Jan 04 2004 - 21:10:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:36 UTC