Re: Future of RAIDFrame

From: Scott Long <scottl_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 18:12:28 -0700
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:12:57 +0100
> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> 
> 
>>As much as I would hate to see RF and Vinum disappar from our
>>source tree, maybe what we need to do is to kick them both into
>>"training-camp" in p4 while you and Greg look the other way.
> 
> [...]
> 
>>I'd say lets kick them both into perforce and let whoever wants
>>their hands have a go at them.
> 
> 
> RF isn't working today on -current, vinum is (please don't tell me
> something else, I don't want the system under my desk stop running on a
> vinum volume just because you say it has to :-)). Do you really want to
> throw your axe at vinum while it's still alive?
> 
> Bye,
> Alexander.
> 

Ok, stop right here.  This is the third email so for that is attempting
the debate the merits of one over the other.  Spending time arguing that
point is a waste of time.  If working on RF is something that interests
you, then show your support and say so.

Scott
Received on Sat Jan 10 2004 - 16:14:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:37 UTC