Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:12:57 +0100 > "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > > >>As much as I would hate to see RF and Vinum disappar from our >>source tree, maybe what we need to do is to kick them both into >>"training-camp" in p4 while you and Greg look the other way. > > [...] > >>I'd say lets kick them both into perforce and let whoever wants >>their hands have a go at them. > > > RF isn't working today on -current, vinum is (please don't tell me > something else, I don't want the system under my desk stop running on a > vinum volume just because you say it has to :-)). Do you really want to > throw your axe at vinum while it's still alive? > > Bye, > Alexander. > Ok, stop right here. This is the third email so for that is attempting the debate the merits of one over the other. Spending time arguing that point is a waste of time. If working on RF is something that interests you, then show your support and say so. ScottReceived on Sat Jan 10 2004 - 16:14:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:37 UTC