Re: Future of RAIDFrame

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:33:24 +0100
In message <xzphdz2qicf.fsf_at_dwp.des.no>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=
 writes:
>"M. Warner Losh" <imp_at_bsdimp.com> writes:
>> Maybe this would be a good test-case for seeing how well it works?
>> Maybe not.  We do need to run a few more test-cases for things through
>> this scenario...  I'm not sure this one is well suited to it.
>
>If we toss out Vinum, there's a significant risk that 5.3 will ship
>without RAID support at all.  I'm pretty certain we don't want that.

If we don't do something drastic, there's a significant risk that
5.3 and all future releases will ship with partially broken RAID
support.  I'm pretty certain we don't want that either.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sun Jan 11 2004 - 21:33:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:37 UTC