On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 13:28, Jonathan T. Sage wrote: > Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:19:11PM +0100, Josef El-Rayes wrote: > > > >>"Jonathan T. Sage" <sagejona_at_theatre.msu.edu> wrote: > >> > >>>1. a lot of the commits are going to be ports related, and > >>>therefore dropped immediatally. this sort of report is handled > >>>wonderfully by dan _at_ freshports, i see no reason to duplicate > >>>what he has done > >> > >>why excluding ports? i think important changes in the ports area > >>should be covered here too. > > > > > > As Jonathan said, the freshports is the best site where you can > > get all issues about it. > > > > -Kirill > Exactally, and as Mark pointed out, I think that keeping in changes to > the ports infrastructure (bsd.ports.mk) would be an excellent idea. And that's the plan. As you can see from my recent email to ports_at_ about the bsd.gnome.mk changes, I will be updating ports_at_ and ports-developers_at_ about ports infrastructure changes under my control. These will contain more detailed information than is found in the commit logs. Joe > > ~j -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:37 UTC