On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:32:50PM +0100, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:28:27PM -0500, Jonathan T. Sage wrote: > > Exactally, and as Mark pointed out, I think that keeping in changes to > > the ports infrastructure (bsd.ports.mk) would be an excellent idea. > > Yes, I think portmgr_at_ should mail to ports_at_ and explain the > most important updates to bsd.*.mk > I am working on a plan to document major changes in about the same style as for src. That is, a file /usr/src/CHANGES with important information to developers (bsd.*.mk and port changes that affect a lot of other porss) and adding a section to Release Notes on the web site with information to ports users. -- _._ _,-'""`-._ Erwin Lansing (,-.`._,'( |\`-/| erwin_at_lansing.dk http://droso.org `-.-' \ )-`( , o o) erwin_at_FreeBSD.org -bf- `- \`_`"'-
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:37 UTC