Kirill Ponomarew <krion_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:28:27PM -0500, Jonathan T. Sage wrote: > > Exactally, and as Mark pointed out, I think that keeping in changes to > > the ports infrastructure (bsd.ports.mk) would be an excellent idea. > > Yes, I think portmgr_at_ should mail to ports_at_ and explain the > most important updates to bsd.*.mk i was rather thinking about new major ports, or big repo copies. i think this is worth being mentioned in a report. of course things are covered on mailinglists and freshports and othere sites, but i think, as a summary on the whole projects work all areas should be covered. -josef
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:37 UTC