Hi, >>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:16:59 +0000 (UTC) >>>>> bzeeb-lists_at_lists.zabbadoz.net ("Bjoern A. Zeeb") said: bzeeb-lists> I have built a HEAD kernel from this evening. bzeeb-lists> crashing the kernel is more easy than booting it... bzeeb-lists> So the big question at the moment is - why will it not happen if I bzeeb-lists> remove the unlink call from the spdflush ? What am I missing ? bzeeb-lists> If anybody has any more ideas please let me know; I will nost likely bzeeb-lists> not find the time for more debugging until sat eve. Do you mean that following patch itojun offered doesn't help for you? It seems fix the problem here. Index: sys/netkey/key.c diff -up sys/netkey/key.c.orig sys/netkey/key.c --- sys/netkey/key.c.orig Fri Jan 16 17:06:26 2004 +++ sys/netkey/key.c Fri Jan 16 17:07:38 2004 _at__at_ -1958,7 +1958,6 _at__at_ key_spdadd(so, m, mhp) newsp->lifetime = lft ? lft->sadb_lifetime_addtime : 0; newsp->validtime = lft ? lft->sadb_lifetime_usetime : 0; - newsp->refcnt = 1; /* do not reclaim until I say I do */ newsp->state = IPSEC_SPSTATE_ALIVE; LIST_INSERT_TAIL(&sptree[newsp->dir], newsp, secpolicy, chain); _at__at_ -7591,9 +7590,10 _at__at_ key_sp_unlink(sp) { /* remove from SP index */ - if (__LIST_CHAINED(sp)) + if (__LIST_CHAINED(sp)) { LIST_REMOVE(sp, chain); - key_freesp(sp); + key_freesp(sp); + } } /* XXX too much? */ Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO _at_ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume_at_mahoroba.org ume_at_bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume_at_{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/Received on Thu Jan 15 2004 - 23:12:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:38 UTC