In message <E1Ahyej-0000OI-5l_at_psg.com>, Randy Bush writes: >>>> How active was the file system that was being read by (r)dump? >>> not at all. it was a laptop with nothing active on it >>> except for the dump. >> OK; fair enough -- but I couldn't tell from your note, and "active file >> system" has been a plausible culprit in most such cases I've seen so >> far. >>> it did have X and gnome up. but it has 1gb ram, so should >>> not have been swapping or anything. >> :-) > >btw, what i forgot to say was > o source system is current as of yesterday > o dest system is stable as of today > o until the last upgrade to the stable dest, dump would never > complete! it always got to the same point, 86%, and then hung This is actually a pretty normal thing, dump is not very good at predicting the size of a dump if the filesystem is live (and I belive in a few other circumstances as well) Largest number I've seen recently was -250% :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Sat Jan 17 2004 - 13:13:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:38 UTC