On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 01:08:46AM -0600, Mark Johnston wrote: >- Subject matter - too narrow? too broad? should I cover the -current > list instead of cvs-src, or try to combine both into one report? It would be nice to see a -current summary but I think it should be a separate report and I'd be a bit concerned about burnout if you tried to do both yourself. I'd start by producing the cvs-src report only for a few months and see how things turn out. >- Prose - too technical? not technical enough? too flowery? too plain? Good - just right. > >- Commits covered - Did I miss anything I should have included, or > include things I should have skipped? I don't recall seeing any commits that should have been mentioned but weren't and didn't see anything in the report that I felt should have been left out. >- Impartial? I've tried not to attribute consensus and opinions where > they weren't very clear; have I succeeded? I think the report was impartial >- Interest - would you be interested in seeing something like this > produced weekly? Definitely. I think the report is an excellent idea. PeterReceived on Sat Jan 24 2004 - 13:03:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:39 UTC