On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 04:12:33PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > Yep. BTW, I've updated the port to omit e2fsprogs' "fsck" command, to > avoid confusion. Unfortunately, I haven't yet seen feedback from > Tytso. He's downloaded my changes according to BK logs, but no new > release or merge yet. :-( I'm hesitant to release a "somewhat rogue" > snapshot from the development sources as official port. Sorry, I forgot to send you a note; yes, I've accepted your changes and they're in my bitkeeper repository. > I am wondering how to deal with /etc/fstab. I can of course add a > symlink from /sbin/fsck_ext2fs to %D/sbin/e2fsck, so I can type "fsck > /linux" and have the file system checked, but this will not work when > someone sets the Pass# column in fsck to something non-zero. But that's what's supposed to happen when someone sets the Pass# to zero, yes? Or is the problem that in the past, /sbin/fsck_ext2fs wasn't available, so some people may have put zero into the column in order to prevent errors at boot time? Can BSD packages in the ports system allowed prompt the user upon installation/upgrade? If so the obvious thing to do is to ask the user, when they install the new version of e2fsprogs, whether they want the pass # in /etc/fstab to be reset to some sane value, and then have the postinstall script do that. - TedReceived on Tue Jan 27 2004 - 11:05:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:40 UTC