Re: Processes blocked on ufs or getblk

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 21:54:32 +0100
In message <EE3D3FBAFFCAED448C21C398FDAD91AC013BDE74_at_EBE1.gc.nat>, "Robin P. Bl
anchard" writes:
>
>> >Given the lockedvnod message:
>> >Locked vnodes
>> >0xc7003378: tag ufs, type VREG, usecount 2, writecount 0, 
>> refcount 1, 
>> >flags (VV_OBJBUF), lock type ufs: EXCL (count 1) by thread 
>> 0xc6066d20 (pid 81250)
>> >        ino 2523831, on dev aacd0s1g (4, 26)
>> >
>> >Should I substitue aacd0s1g (disk+slice+part) for ad0 in your above 
>> >example ? Or should I be using disk or disk+slice ?
>> 
>> Just aacd0 should do.
>> 
>
>Unfortunately, that didn't help...Thanks for the suggestion, though.

Ok, it worked for the ata problem sos_at_ just committed a fix for,
but obviously the aac related problem is something entirely different.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wed Jan 28 2004 - 11:54:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:40 UTC