In message <EE3D3FBAFFCAED448C21C398FDAD91AC013BDE74_at_EBE1.gc.nat>, "Robin P. Bl anchard" writes: > >> >Given the lockedvnod message: >> >Locked vnodes >> >0xc7003378: tag ufs, type VREG, usecount 2, writecount 0, >> refcount 1, >> >flags (VV_OBJBUF), lock type ufs: EXCL (count 1) by thread >> 0xc6066d20 (pid 81250) >> > ino 2523831, on dev aacd0s1g (4, 26) >> > >> >Should I substitue aacd0s1g (disk+slice+part) for ad0 in your above >> >example ? Or should I be using disk or disk+slice ? >> >> Just aacd0 should do. >> > >Unfortunately, that didn't help...Thanks for the suggestion, though. Ok, it worked for the ata problem sos_at_ just committed a fix for, but obviously the aac related problem is something entirely different. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Wed Jan 28 2004 - 11:54:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:40 UTC