On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Frode Nordahl wrote: > Caught a new and different core dump from rpc.lockd today. > > (gdb) bt > #0 dump_filelock (fl=0x809c000) at lockd_lock.c:318 > #1 0x0804e0a1 in lock_nfslock (fl=0x8080815) at lockd_lock.c:875 Your line numbering seems off. You might want to provide a little more context of what line actually failed. ie. line 875 indicates a test_nfslock() call and 318 is an initial function bracket Nonetheless, the reasons for your core dumps elude me. In both cases, the fl should have caused a core dump *before* the line you are indicating. -aReceived on Thu Jan 29 2004 - 13:22:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:40 UTC