On Friday 30 January 2004 10:36 am, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20040130092529.GA725_at_laptop.6bone.nl> > > Mark Santcroos <marks_at_ripe.net> writes: > : On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:32:54AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > : > I read the spec yesterday, and what is supposed to happen is this: The > : > display (LCD, CRT, etc.) is supposed to be powered down using DPMS. > : > The actual adapter is then supposed to be powered down using either PCI > : > or ACPI sleep states, and the adapter should not be powered down to a > : > lower sleep state (like D3) w/o using DPMS to power the display down to > : > at least that state first. This means that the kernel might need to > : > grow a dummy vga driver of some sort and some simple dpms support for > : > suspend/resume. > : > : I second this. > : > : Nate, can you put it on your acpi-todo list? > > The only problem with having a vga device for suspend/resume is that > it will claim devices that drm wants to claim later and X won't work. > > I have about the simplest driver possible for vga in one of my trees, > and found this to be a problem on my dell i8k. Yes, we need a way I think to have multiple drivers attach to a device, or maybe have the drm drivers attach as a child of the vga device instead. For the intel motherboards with onboard graphics, we already have this problem where drm and agp both want the same device. Having a model of: vga0 drm0 agp0 Might be the sanest way to do this cleanly. -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Fri Jan 30 2004 - 09:08:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:40 UTC