On Saturday 31 January 2004 22:53, Tom wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > ... > > > If I start a process with nice 15 (like seti) it shouldn't slow down my > > machine by exponetial factors. > > It should take cycles which are almost unused and not block regular > > processes (like make) > > ... > > Isn't "idprio" the best way of scheduling a process to run when the > system is otherwise idle? Can you try with idprio? I didn't know that. Thank you for that hint, I'll have a look at it. But I think SCHED_ULE shouldn't behave that different to 4BSD ragrding nice. Thanks, -Harry > > From what I know of "nice", it should reduces the processes scheduling > priority. There is no definition in the nice manpage on the exact > definition of reduced priority means. > > Tom > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:41 UTC