Re: sched_ule [severely] broken

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 01:55:22 +0100

Andy Farkas <andyf_at_speednet.com.au> writes:
> This box has been sitting idle for .5 hour:

Please get a sense of proportion.  A slight error in the CPU usage
statistics for the idle processes does not mark ULE "severely broken".

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no

Received on Sat Jan 31 2004 - 15:55:39 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: ad0: TIMEOUT"
Previous message: Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto: "Re: Syncer "giving up" on buffers"
In reply to: Andy Farkas: "sched_ule [severely] broken"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:41 UTC