On Thursday 01 July 2004 16:32, Divacky Roman wrote: > I have booted -O universe and it works... so there is definitely some > optimalization error - is it worth it to catch the bug? I'd say YES! I agree. > (isnt here even plan for officially supporting -O2?) Well, you should provided some more specific explanation how you use this box. i.e. how do you do NATting (ifpw + natd, ipf, pf or pppd's builtin)? What interfaces do you employ? What is the MTU of your outgoing path? Moreover tcpdumps are of interest in order to see why things do fail. Same for statistics (netstat -ssp {ip, tcp, udp ...}) to learn why the packets are being dropped. > thnx for attention > > roman > > On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:50:25PM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > > I have upgraded from CFLAGS=-O ARCH=p2 may 17th current (both kernel > > and userland) to CFLAGS=-Os (I know its NOT supported) ARCH=athlon-xp > > 30th June current and strange thing happend > > > > The machine in charge is working as a NAT and machines behind that are > > not able to transfer any packet longer than 1472 bytes. its seems > > fragmenting is broken but on that nat machine I am able to transfer > > anything... > > > > I dont ask for help (since -Os is unsupported, but I am compiling -O > > universe now so I might ask for help ;) ) just point it as interesting > > behaviour... maybe some kind of bug? > > and YES I have it all set properly > > > > roman -- Best regards, | mlaier_at_freebsd.org Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier_at_EFnet
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC