On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 13:16, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 12:49:51PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 10:25, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > > > > > Great, glad it works! Yeah, that's the part where you'd potentially > > > want to attach them all; since you're the one with the hardware > > > in a position to really test it, I'd appreciate if you'd add the > > > appropriate USB_DEBUG printfs for the PALM4 (!VISOR) case to see what > > > ports are really available and hopefully get someone who really knows > > > the USB/device drivers to finish making multiple ucom attachment work. > > > > OK, now I'm more confused. Please see the attached patch, which I added > > to grab the connection information. > > > > (Yippee...a chance to embarass myself with my lamer un-l33t kernel > > hacking skillz.) > > > > My debug output looks like (after MTA wordwrap): > > > > Jul 1 12:43:14 tomcat kernel: ucom0: Palm, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev > > 1.00/1.00, addr 2 > > Jul 1 12:43:14 tomcat kernel: ucom0: Palm, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev > > 1.00/1.00, addr 2 > > Jul 1 12:43:14 tomcat kernel: ucom0: Connection 0: port 0 > > end_point_info 33 port_function_id 5f 70 70 70 > > > > If this is right, the only reason that I'm getting a successful > > attachment is the "if (i == nc) i = nc - 1;" fallthrough code. Huh?!? > > I bet it's setting endpoint_numbers_different :) If you look at the > code it gave, it was the string "_ppp" so you could potentially do > memcmp(end_point_info, "_ppp", 4) now that we know what it looks like. > What does it look like when you do HotSync instead of PPP? Jul 1 13:22:50 tomcat kernel: ucom0: Palm, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 2 Jul 1 13:22:50 tomcat kernel: ucom0: Palm, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 2 Jul 1 13:22:50 tomcat kernel: ucom0: Connection 0: port 0 end_point_info 33 port_function_id 63 6e 79 73 Hmmm..."cnys". I guess I was hoping for some kind of Satanic message, but, it's only "sync" backwards. Bruce.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC