Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat removed, linux to follow

n0g0013 wrote:

>On 02.07-19:31, Brad Knowles wrote:
>[ ... ]
>  
>
>>	Yup.  PGP sign everything, and make sure that your keys don't 
>>ever get stolen or compromised.  That makes it much harder for 
>>someone to successfully impersonate you.
>>    
>>
>
>what is the story with PGP signatures these days?  last i
>investigated there was a multi-part mime format that was meant
>to be standard and nobody used (except mutt, which i use).
>
>does anyone use that format or is it all inline now?  mutt
>won't recognise the inline format as signed (and consequently
>won't verify the content).
>
>  
>
Been there, done it, fixed it. Try the following recipe in your 
.procmailrc if you use procmail. If you don't, consider doing it ;)


# Make old style PGP readable for Mutt:
#
:0
* !^Content-Type: message/
* !^Content-Type: multipart/
* !^Content-Type: application/pgp
{
        :0 fBw
        * ^-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
        * ^-----END PGP MESSAGE-----
        | formail -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; 
x-action=encrypt"

        :0 fBw
        * ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
        * ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
        * ^-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
        | formail -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; 
x-action=sign"
}

:0 fBw
* ^-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
* ^-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
| formail -i "Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; format=text;"



Have fun :)