On Tue, Jul 06, 2004, Mark Johnston wrote: > Compiling the system and ports with -O2 > --------------------------------------- > Dag-Erling Smorgrav (des) made a change to make.conf, correcting a comment > that said that -O2 exposed bugs in ppp to mention libalias instead. > > David Schultz (das) replied, saying "I've been compiling most things with > -O2 for a while (to find -O2 bugs, not for speed) and haven't noticed many > problems", except that "-O2 breaks floating-point exceptions in libm". > He suggested that "maybe -O2 should be automatically turned off while > compiling libm (and perhaps libalias as well). That would make it more > easily justifiable to make -O2 the default at some future point." > > Kris Kennaway (kris) responded "I don't think we can ever make it the > default since there's likely to be a lot of software in ports that would > be broken too." > > David answered "99% of the ports that "may break" build with -O2 on Linux ^^^^^ > (as -O2 is their default). What is different about us vs. Linux for these > ports?" That was David O'Brien, not me. ;-) > David responded "Because most everything in the ports collection was > developed on Linux using -O2. The bugs are in our code, not gcc's -O2." Likewise.Received on Wed Jul 07 2004 - 00:45:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:00 UTC