In message <20040707091311.GE12877_at_cicely12.cicely.de>, Bernd Walter writes: >On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 04:32:28PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: >What about those options: >- limit the allocated memory to the user request so we don't take the > whole 128k if not reuired. >- Do interleaving with 2 or more xfers if the read request is known to > take more xfers. I would consider ugen to be a primary candidate to use physio like I belive scsi-tape drives do ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Wed Jul 07 2004 - 07:16:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:00 UTC